Posts Tagged ‘Bovine TB’

Concerns Over Proposed Badger Cull

August 24th, 2011

BadgersNatural England, the body who would be responsible for issuing licences to shoot badgers under Defra’s cull proposals, has expressed doubts over the efficacy of culling in reducing bovine TB in cattle. As part of its response to the Defra consultation on the cull, Natural England admitted it had a “low level of confidence” that badger culling would effectively tackle bTB.

In the response it acknowledged the dreadful cost of bTB on the farming community and its wider impact; the disease costs taxpayers £90 million annually, but said it did not believe that, based on the available evidence, the Defra proposals would eradicate or significantly reduce the disease’s impact.

The conservation body expressed misgivings over the methodology of Defra’s proposals, saying that, as ‘free-shooting’ running badgers differed greatly from the methods used in the randomised culling trial (RBCT) conducted by Lord Krebs, the outcome would not be consistent with the RBCT’s 16 per cent reduction.

The independent scientific group which oversaw the trial concluded, “reductions in cattle TB incidence achieved by repeated badger culling were not sustained in the long term after culling ended and did not offset the financial costs of culling. These results … suggest that badger culling is unlikely to contribute effectively to the control of cattle TB in Britain.”

Natural England instead recommended increasing cattle-based measures as per Defra’s recommendations in its bTB control strategy. To support this, it pointed out that up to 70 per cent of bTB breakdowns are of non-badger origin.

As well as questioning whether Defra’s farmer-led cull would work, the body posited that a cull could have a serious impact on wild badger populations. Badgers are a protected species and Natural England warned that populations could take decades to recover. This could incur hefty fines from the EU.

It recommended independent monitoring of the cull be carried out well beyond the pilot stage, further restricting the size of badger control areas and limiting the number of licences granted to fewer than ten a year.

Natural England did acknowledge that badgers’ “role in transmitting TB to cattle cannot be ignored,” and stated “in the absence, to date, of an effective cattle vaccine, all measures that are effective in minimising cross-infection between cattle and badgers must form part of any disease control strategy.”

UK Badger Cull Could Go Ahead

July 11th, 2011

The Government is soon to announce whether or not it will allow a cull of badgers in order to help halt the spread of TB in cattle in the coming days, as farmers insist it would not be a “free-for-all” on killing the protected animals. The first badger cull was proposed over a year ago but a decision has been put on hold due to disputes over the same issue in Wales.

It appears likely the move will give the green light for farmers to cull badgers, after experts, including its chief scientist and chief vet, concluded that co-ordinated and sustained culling could reduce TB rates in cattle.

Farmers want to see a policy to control badgers, which can spread TB to livestock, to tackle a problem they say is one of the greatest threats currently facing beef and dairy farmers, particularly in areas of Staffordshire, Shropshire, Worcestershire and Herefordshire.

The scheme could allow farmers to shoot badgers that are running free, rather than trap and shoot them, as it is a much cheaper option for landowners who will be responsible for covering the cost of the cull.

The RSPCA warned last week that a cull would not work, and licensing farmers and landowners to carry out the scheme could prove inhumane. But farmers are keen to point out that any cull would be carried out by people who were trained, monitored and licensed according to strict conditions.

The National Farmers’ Union has been coming up with plans that would allow groups of farmers to group together to form companies which can then apply for a licence and contract out the cull for a sufficiently large area to ensure it is effective. Of course, this needs the cull to be approved in the first place.

The companies will ensure that farmers contribute their share of the money, stay in the scheme for the required four years and retain an element of anonymity in case they are targeted by animal rights extremists.

NFU president Peter Kendall said: “If given the go-ahead any badger control policy will be implemented by fully trained professionals.”

“People must move away from the idea that a green light will mean farmers having a free-for-all. This is simply not the case. This has never been about eradicating badgers. This is about disease control.”

“The science has demonstrated in its most recent reports that culling badgers will help reduce the incidence of bovine TB in cattle and the costs have been brought under control by industry looking at best practice and controlled humane shooting.”

And he said: “Most right-minded people want a solution to the devastating impact bovine TB has; on our farming families, on the stress caused to cattle forced into testing regimes every 60 days and for badgers that also carry bovine TB.”

Welsh Badger Cull Subject To Review

June 22nd, 2011

The Welsh Government’s decision to delay the cull of badgers in Wales has been welcomed by animal campaigners, while farmers and landowners have reacting angrily to the news.

Welsh Environment Minister John Griffiths announced yesterday (Tuesday) that a review of the evidence base on eradicating Bovine TB in Wales would be carried out by an independent panel of experts, overseen by Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor John Harries.

Mr Griffiths said: “Bovine TB is the subject of considerable debate. This is also true of the huge body of scientific research related to the disease.

“The eradication of bovine TB in Wales is a long term Welsh Government commitment. It will require the application of new technologies and scientific developments as they become available. The Welsh Government will continue to monitor these new technologies and the continued evolution of the policy.”

Mr Griffiths also confirmed there would be no culling of badgers whilst the review is being carried out in the North Pembrokeshire Intensive Action Area, the review expected to be delivered in the autumn.

Chair of Pembrokeshire Against the Cull (PAC), Celia Thomas said: “We are optimistic that a scientific review will favour a long term solution that reduces bovine TB in both cattle and badgers, a solution that culling cannot offer.”

Both the National Farmers’ Union (NFU) and the Farmers Union of Wales (FUW) criticised the decision, saying that sufficient scientific research had already been carried out.

FUW TB spokesman and Vice President Brian Walters said: “Cattle farmers are being crippled by this disease, are incurring massive extra costs and are seeing their businesses locked down, particularly in north Pembrokeshire where harsh restrictions have been in place for well over a year.”

Stephen James, NFU Cymru’s Deputy President said: “Time is of the essence, we’ve already waited too long. It is crucial that the peer review group is set up swiftly, that the terms of reference are agreed without delay and that the group reports to the Minister by the autumn at the latest. Unless a rigorous timetable is adhered to farmers will be convinced that this exercise is no more than a sham.”

The Badger Trust welcomed the news, saying that it remained “determined to take whatever legal steps are required to safeguard this protected species against unjustified slaughter,” although it hoped its proposed judicial review challenge could be avoided.

“Badger Cull Won’t Halt Bovine TB”

May 25th, 2011

Culling badgers is scientifically proven to be ineffective in reducing the spread of bovine TB, a high-profile naturalist has warned. Television presenter Chris Packham, who is opposed to the cull, made the claim ahead of the new series of popular programme Springwatch, which he will front.

His co-presenter Kate Humble, who is also against a badger cull, said a solution must be found, adding that the issue was “not a welfare issue, [but] an economic one”.

The Welsh Government has approved a cull in a bid to eradicate bovine TB, which has led to the slaughter of 60,000 cattle in Wales over the past decade.

Former rural affairs minister Elin Jones, who began the cull proceedings, has said: “After full consideration of the evidence presented to me, including consideration of the responses to the recent Consultation on Badger Control in the Intensive Action Area, I have reached the decision to proceed with legislation which would enable a government led cull of badgers in the intensive action area.”

The Badger Trust is mounting a legal challenge to the plans to kill badgers in a 111-acre pilot intensive action area centred on north Pembrokeshire.

Humble  said: “It’s a really emotive issue and people like Adam Henson, who has had positive TB tests on his farm, are right at the front line of dealing with this – he’s had death threats.

“At my home in Wales, we have badgers practically doing the tango on our lawn, which is lovely, but I’m also seeing my friend and neighbour having to shoot 25 cattle with TB, some of them pregnant, so he’s losing thousands and thousands of pounds.

“He doesn’t want to shoot badgers, he’s an organic farmer, but he doesn’t want to be shooting cattle either. So a solution has to be found that works for farmers, and the public need to understand bovine TB is a huge problem that impacts on every one of us. It’s not a welfare issue, it’s an economic one.

“People tend to think if you’re an animal lover, you’re against killing things. Well no, sometimes, unfortunately, that is part of wildlife management – it is a delicate jigsaw and the badger/cattle problem is one of the thorniest bits of that jigsaw.”

Packham said: “Science currently proves it’s ineffective in reducing the spread of bovine TB.”

Welsh Badger Cull Highlights Questions

May 20th, 2011

Welsh farmers that are concerned about possible reprisals from animal rights activists as a result of proposed badger culls believe that protecting their identities might be an option. This option is currently available to farmers in England.

The Welsh Government said it had not yet had requests for such a move.

Cull proposals are different in England in that individual farmers may be allowed to carry out the cull under licence. In Wales it would be carried out by Welsh Government contractors.

Farming unions in England say the security of their members is vitally important and they are considering advising farmers to set up private limited companies. Disclosure requirements for those kinds of businesses mean farmers’ details would not be as visible to the public.

Some animal rights groups have warned they will “hit farmers in their pockets” by damaging fences and buildings if they are involved in the proposed cull in Wales, although there have been no specific threats.

At present farming leaders say there is no plan to protect the identity of farmers whose land falls within the Intensive Action Area in Wales. In March AMs backed a new cull proposal for parts of mid and west Wales.

It is claimed it will help tackle TB in cattle but conservationists say there are other solutions to the problem such as vaccines and tighter controls on the movement of cattle.

Farming unions in Wales have told members not to respond to phone calls asking them if they support the cull and some farmers have been advised to install security cameras and make sure they are known to the local police. The Welsh Government said it had not had any requests from farmers in the cull area to protest their identity.

Adam Henson Reveals Extremist Threats

May 9th, 2011

This article has been taken directly from Farmer’s Guardian

TV presenter Adam Henson has revealed that he has received hate mail, including threats to his children, from animal welfare extremists because of his comments on bovine TB. Mr Henson has investigated the disease, which has affected his own Gloucestershire farm, in depth on the BBC’s Countryfile programme. He has now told a farming conference in Cornwall how the features have sparked threats from ‘very nasty extremists’.

“I have had some serious hate letters from them – things like ‘we are going to burn your children’,” he is quoted as saying in press reports today, including on www.thisiscornwall.co.uk

Mr Henson said the abuse was unfair as strict BBC guidelines ensure his ‘hands are tied’ when it comes to comments on the merits of badger culling. “These guidelines are very strict. So you will never hear me saying we should be culling badgers. My hands are completely tied on the issue. I cannot campaign for anything at all, simply report what is said on both sides,” Mr Henson said during a question and answer session.

“But this is a hugely emotive subject and we have to realise that there are extremists on both sides of the argument.” He said conservation groups and farmers were ‘at war’ with each other but should be working together to solve the problem. “Badgers are fantastic animals to watch and can be a great asset, and there should be middle ground between farming and conservationists on tackling the bovine TB problem,” he said.

His comments came as the Badger Trust sought to distance itself from threats of direct action against anyone who takes part in badger culls proposed in England and Wales. In a statement, the Trust quotes the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) as warning that it will ‘hit farmers in their pockets by tearing down fences and damaging buildings over the destruction of badgers in Wales’.

It also highlights comments on www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk in which a spokesman for ALF is quoted as warning that its members could take direct action if licences to cull badgers were granted in England. Despite highlighting the comments, the Badger Trust said in a statement that it ‘dissociates itself from any proposals to use force or intimidation towards anyone carrying out trapping, shooting or any other procedures that may be officially approved’.

But the trust said it ‘recognises the right of all organisations and individuals, including local badger groups, to demonstrate peacefully against such disproportionate and futile bTB policies, and it will continue to use all possible legal means of rational persuasion and challenge’.

Last week Farming Minister Jim Paice said he was still hoping to announce the decision on a badger cull in England before Parliament breaks for recess in July. He said on the of the main reasons for the delay in making the announcement was to ensure any culling policy was legally watertight in the face of the inevitable legal challenge form the Badger Trust.

Condemned Bull Gets Reprieve

April 15th, 2011

THE Yorkshire bull condemned to death on the basis of a contaminated TB test has been granted a reprieve after a High Court judge ruled the Government had broken its own rules.

Hallmark Boxster, known as Boxy, faced being destroyed after testing positive for bovine TB, but Ken Jackson, of Forlorn Hope Farm in South Yorkshire, and his daughter Kate McNeil challenged the validity of the test that condemned their “unique and irreplaceable” showground champion.

And at the High Court in London yesterday Mr Justice McCombe quashed the notices of intended slaughter, ruling that the test taken in relation to Boxy was flawed and ordered £15,000 to be paid towards court costs.

Mrs McNeil said she and her father were “absolutely delighted” by the ruling and they were waiting to hear what the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) intended to do next.

She said: “We are just so happy, we feel we got justice. We have taken it stage by stage and not looked too far forward. It is a relief to have got a positive outcome.”

A positive blood sample was taken from the bull in April last year and officials from Defra issued notices of intended slaughter, leading to the legal battle to save Boxy’s life.

Mr Jackson, whose farm is at Stubbs Walden, north of Doncaster, argued that the officers who took the sample mixed two half-full vials in the field, contrary to written procedures.

The judge refused Defra permission to appeal, but the department could still make an application directly to the Court of Appeal in a bid to take the case further.

A Defra spokesman said: “We are naturally disappointed by this judgment and will carefully consider its implications and our next steps, including whether to appeal.”