Archive for November, 2011

‘Many farmers’ not aware of Biomass and Solar Energy support

November 25th, 2011

The RHI Scheme provides financial support to non-domestic operations including farms, for the heat that they use from renewable sources, such as biomass and solar thermal. The scheme could potentially have huge benefits for farmers, particularly those with their own biomass fuel supply like poultry manure or horse manure etc. It seems though that many farmers are not familiar with the new scheme.

One poultry farmer achieved payback on his biomass boiler in just two and a half years from the savings he made on his energy bills. That was before the RHI Scheme too. Farmers should seriously consider the RHI Scheme, they will be surprised at the savings they can make. says Sean Gilbride, CEO, lakelandrenewables.co.uk.

The general consensus is that a lot of farmers simply don’t have the time to keep track of new renewable energy grants and supports due to their hectic schedule. As energy costs continue to rise, biomass and solar look more and more attractive and it seems as though agricultural sector looks set to get the biggest benefit.

According to Sean Gilbride the RHI Scheme makes renewable energy an essential asset for any farm. Many waste products produced locally can be used to fuel biomass boilers. This reduces waste management costs along with the energy savings you would expect from your energy bills.

All in all it’s definitely worthwhile doing the analysis to determine if a renewable energy system is right for your farm.

Urgent Need to Reduce EU Food Waste

November 24th, 2011

Almost 50% of food that is both healthy and edible gets wasted in EU households and supermarkets every year. At the same time 79 million EU citizens are living beneath the poverty line and 16 million depend on food aid from charitable institutions. The Agriculture Committee called for urgent measures to halve food waste by 2025 and to improve access to food for needy EU citizens.

Since food is wasted at all stages – by producers, processors, retailers, caterers and consumers, the Agriculture Committee called for EU and national measures to improve the efficiency of the food supply and consumption chains, sector by sector, e.g. by promoting direct relations between producers and consumers and to tackle food wastage as a matter of urgency.

“This issue has been neglected for far too long now and this report sends a strong signal that the EU needs to take action now”, said rapporteur Salvatore Caronna (S&D, IT), after the vote.

This is a drastic reduction in food wastage by 2025 and to achieve this, new awareness campaigns should be promoted at both EU and national levels to inform the public how to avoid excessive wastage of food, says the resolution. Member States should introduce food education courses in schools and colleges explaining how to store, cook and dispose the food and exchange best practices to this end.

Local authorities and media should also be involved in providing information and support to citizens on preventing and reducing food waste. To popularise the idea using food sustainably, MEPs called for 2013 to be designated as the European year against food waste.

Proper labelling and packaging

To avoid situations in which foods are being offered by retailers too close to their expiry date, thus increasing the potential for wastage, dual-date labelling could be introduced to show until when food may be sold (sell-by date) and until when it may consumed (use-by date), says the resolution, adding that the European Commission and Member States should nonetheless first ensure that customers understand the difference between currently used labels within the EU such as the quality-related “best before” and safety-related “use by” dates.

To prevent unnecessary waste, food packaging should offered in a range of sizes and designed to conserve food better. Out-of-date and damaged food products should be sold at discounted prices, MEPs say.

Public institutions should favour responsible caterers

Rules for public procurement on catering and hospitality should be updated to ensure that where possible, contracts are awarded to catering companies that use local produce and give away or redistribute leftover food to poorer people or food banks free of charge rather than disposing of it.

Leftovers to feed people in need

MEPs also welcomed existing initiatives in some Member States to recover unsold food and offer it to needy citizens and called on retailers to take part in such programmes.

Next Steps

The resolution drafted by Mr. Caronna was approved in committee with 38 votes in favour to one against. The vote in plenary is scheduled for the next Strasbourg session (12 – 15 December 2011).

Government Food Standards Don’t Match McDonald’s

November 18th, 2011

Food campaigners have criticised the Government’s poor standards when it comes to sourcing its food. The RSPCA and the Soil Association amongst others have accused the government of failing to lead by example. This came after research showed that the compulsory ethical and environmental standards for the food served in public institutions were below those that fast food giant McDonald’s sets itself.

The research was carried out by the Good Food For Our Money coalition and the Government’s new ‘Government Buying Standards’ were compared to those of McDonald’s. The Government’s regulations cover food bought by prisons, parts of the military and various other departments. In all cases, the standards set by McDonald’s were found to be “equivalent or higher” than those of the government.

The co-ordinator of the campaign which represents over 60 organisations, Alex Jackson, said “These new standards are feeble. If the Government cannot even match McDonald’s food standards, how can anyone take seriously their claim to be the greenest government ever?”

The research has highlighted some notable individual cases:

  • Eggs that are purchased by the Government have to be laid in ‘enriched cages’ as a minimum but McDonald’s only use British, free-range eggs.
  • Milk bought by the Government only has to meet the UK legal minimum standards of production while only organic milk is used in Mcdonald’s food.
  • Only 50% of all the coffee that is bought by the government has to be fairly traded (i.e carry Fairtrade or Rainforest Alliance certification) whereas McDonald’s specifies that all of its coffee must be from these sources.

 

 

Defra launches £20m grant for green farming

November 11th, 2011

Defra has announced a new fund of £20m which will be used to help rural businesses “increase profits and reduce their impact on the environment”; Agriculture Minister Jim Paice launched the initiative which will ensure money goes to farmers, foresters and horticulturalists who can put a green spin on growing their business.

Part of Defra’s Rural Development Programme for England (RDPE), the Farming and Forestry Improvement Scheme will award grants of up to £25,000 to farmers for investment in ‘green’ projects and new machinery to make their enterprises more sustainable. The scheme was unveiled by Jim Paice at Harper Adams University College, Shropshire this morning.

The grants are intended to cover a maximum of half the total cost of a project in uplands areas and 40 per cent elsewhere. Defra also added that the grants would also be subject to a number of criteria that need to be. The department said the projects must result in either energy being saved or carbon emissions reduced. For example, eligible projects could be the better use of manure to reduce dependence on artificial fertilisers, initiatives to improve soil quality, water saving measures and improvements to animal health and welfare.

Landowners interested in creating sustainable forestry operations will also be eligible for a grant to give them a financial incentive to manage woodland in a way which improves biodiversity. The move has been welcomed by industry and countryside groups, including the Country Land and Business Association and NFU, who said the move was a logical one given the current economic crisis.

A CLA spokesperson said, “This is a welcome initiative which we understand will apply to a range of schemes from small bio-fuel projects and rainwater harvesting through to herd health monitoring technology and timber processing.”

Defra said funds will be allocated from now until December 2013.

Farming Deaths Still Too High

November 2nd, 2011

Farming is lagging behind other industries in reducing injuries and deaths, says the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Three farm workers in Carmarthenshire, Ceredigion and Powys have been killed in the last year according to new accident figures.

“People in farming don’t have minor injuries; when they get injured it’s bad,” said HSE chair Judith Hackitt. Although it’s not a quick fix, Farming unions in Wales said they were working hard on the problem.

The HSE said its figures for 2010-11 showed three deaths in Wales; in 2008-09 there was one farming death, while in 2009-10 two fatalities were reported. In total across the UK, 34 agriculture workers were killed at work in the past year, down from 39 in 2009-10.

Agriculture accounts for one in five British workplace deaths even though farmers form less than 2% of the working population. In Wales the figure is slightly higher at 3%. Other industries that are potentially dangerous, like building or quarrying, have lowered the number of workplace deaths and injuries considerably over the last 10 years.

Farming however remains a problem.

HSE chair Ms Hackitt said getting people in agriculture to recognise just what a big problem safety was, was one of the reasons why farming had not mirrored other industries in reducing work-related injuries and deaths.

“When I said to the NFU that if I had sons I would not want them to work in agriculture, it really made them sit up and take notice,” she said.

Major agricultural injuries in Wales are also a problem and in the past year 25 were reported, the same as 2009-10. They are down slightly from 28 in 2008-09.

But there is some good news; Welsh farmers requiring more than three days or more off work due to injury fell to 18, compared to 25 in 2009-10 and 29 in 2008-09.

NFU Cymru held a farm safety summit with the Farmers’ Union of Wales (FUW), Wales Young Farmers’ Club, the Welsh government and the Royal Agricultural Benevolent Institution and others earlier this year.

Reacting to the latest figures, NFU Cymru president Ed Bailey said: “We are all agreed we have to raise the profile of farm safety in order to reduce this awful number of deaths announced today and the serious injuries we constantly hear about in the news.

“This is not going to be a quick-fix campaign unfortunately.

“All organisations involved in the farm safety summit are agreed we are in this for the long-term with a dogged determination to get farmers thinking of their safety – first and foremost.”

FUW president Emyr Jones said health and safety was a vital issue, and the union was working hard to highlight it.

He added: “Many farmers work alone, often in isolated areas, many jobs are routine in nature and when someone is tired after a hard day’s work attention to detail may slip and accidents can happen.

“The statistics for Wales make very worrying reading and highlight the need for us all to ensure that the health and safety message gets out there.”